Rising Challenges in Antibacterial Drug Resistance: Navigating the Advanced Panorama of Microbial Adaptation and Therapeutic Implications”
Rising Challenges in Antibacterial Drug Resistance: Navigating the Advanced Panorama of Microbial Adaptation and Therapeutic Implications
PRINCIPLES OF ANTIBIOTIC
RESISTANCE
There are 4 main mechanisms that mediate bacterial resis-
tance to medication (Desk 11–1). (1) Micro organism produce enzymes that
inactivate the drug (e.g., β-lactamases can inactivate penicil-
lins and cephalosporins by cleaving the β-lactam ring of the
drug). (2) Micro organism synthesize modified targets in opposition to which
the drug has a decreased impact (e.g., a mutant protein within the 30S
ribosomal subunit can lead to resistance to streptomycin, and
a methylated 23S rRNA can lead to resistance to erythromy-
cin). (3) Micro organism scale back permeability to the drug such that an
efficient intracellular focus of the drug shouldn’t be achieved
(e.g., adjustments in porins can scale back the quantity of penicillin
coming into the bacterium). (4) Micro organism actively export medication
utilizing a “multidrug-resistance pump” (MDR pump, or “efflux”
pump). The MDR pump imports protons and, in an exchange-
sort response, exports a wide range of international molecules together with
sure antibiotics, similar to tetracyclines.
Most drug resistance is because of a genetic change within the organ-
ism, both a chromosomal mutation or the acquisition of a
plasmid or transposon. Nongenetic adjustments, similar to micro organism
inside an abscess being tougher to succeed in with the antibi-
otic, are mentioned later on this chapter.
The time period high-level resistance refers to resistance that
can’t be overcome by growing the dose of the antibiotic.
A special antibiotic, normally from one other class of medication, is
used. Resistance mediated by enzymes similar to β-lactamases
usually ends in high-level resistance, as all of the drug is destroyed.
Low-level resistance refers to resistance that may be overcome
by growing the dose of the antibiotic. Resistance mediated by
mutations within the gene encoding a drug goal is commonly low degree,
because the altered goal can nonetheless bind among the drug however with
decreased power.
As an example using these phrases, strains of Neisseria gonor-
rhoeae that produce penicillinase can’t be handled efficiently
with penicillin G. They exhibit high-level resistance, and a dif-
ferent drug similar to ceftriaxone have to be used. Nonetheless, strains
of N. gonorrhoeae that synthesize altered penicillin-binding pro-
teins exhibit low-level resistance and might be handled efficiently
with high-dose penicillin G.
Hospital-acquired infections are considerably extra probably
to be brought on by antibiotic-resistant organisms than are
community-acquired infections. That is very true for
hospital infections brought on by Staphylococcus aureus and enteric
gram-negative rods similar to Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa. Antibiotic-resistant organisms are frequent within the
hospital setting as a result of widespread antibiotic use in hospitals
selects for these organisms. Moreover, hospital strains are
usually proof against a number of antibiotics. This resistance is normally
as a result of acquisition of plasmids carrying a number of genes that
encode the enzymes that mediate resistance.
Desk 11–2 describes sure medically necessary bacte-
ria and the primary medication to which they’re resistant. Observe that
though these micro organism are proof against different medication as properly, for
simplicity, solely essentially the most attribute medication are listed. Some
strains of the micro organism listed in Desk 11–2 are extremely resistant
to a number of antibiotics, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus
(MRSA; see Chapter 15), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus
faecium (VRE; see Chapter 15), multidrug-resistant Streptococcus
pneumoniae (MDR-SP; see Chapter 15), P. aeruginosa (see
Chapter 18), and multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
(MDR-MTB; see Chapter 21).
GENETIC BASIS OF RESISTANCE
Chromosome-Mediated Resistance
Chromosomal resistance is because of a mutation within the gene that
codes for both the goal of the drug or the transport system
within the membrane that controls the uptake of the drug. The fre-
quency of spontaneous mutations normally ranges from 10–7 to
10–9, which is way decrease than the frequency of acquisition of
resistance plasmids. Due to this fact, chromosomal resistance is much less
of a medical downside than is plasmid-mediated resistance.
The therapy of sure infections with two or extra medication
is predicated on the next precept. If the frequency {that a} bac-
terium mutates to turn out to be proof against antibiotic A is 10–7 (1 in
10 million) and the frequency that the identical bacterium mutates
to turn out to be proof against antibiotic B is 10–8 (1 in 100 million),
then the possibility that the bacterium will turn out to be proof against
each antibiotics (assuming that the antibiotics act by completely different
mechanisms) is the product of the 2 chances, or 10–15.
It’s subsequently extremely unlikely that the bacterium will turn out to be
proof against each antibiotics. Acknowledged one other method, though an
organism might turn out to be resistant to at least one antibiotic, it’s probably that
it will likely be successfully handled by the opposite antibiotic.
Plasmid-Mediated Resistance
Plasmid-mediated resistance is essential from a medical
viewpoint for 3 causes:
(1) It happens in many various species, particularly gram-
unfavourable rods.
(2) Plasmids ceaselessly mediate resistance to a number of medication.
(3) Plasmids have a excessive price of switch from one cell to
one other, normally by conjugation.
Resistance plasmids (resistance elements, R elements) are
extrachromosomal, round, double-stranded DNA molecules
that carry the genes for a wide range of enzymes that may degrade
antibiotics and modify membrane transport methods (Determine 11–1).
Desk 11–3 describes a very powerful mechanisms of resis-
tance for a number of necessary medication.
R elements might carry one antibiotic resistance gene or might
carry two or extra of those genes. The medical implication of a
plasmid carrying a couple of resistance gene is twofold: first
and most evident is {that a} bacterium containing that plasmid
FIGURE 11–1 Resistance plasmid (R plasmid, R issue). Most
resistance plasmids have two units of genes: (1) resistance switch
genes that encode the intercourse pilus and different proteins that mediate
switch of the plasmid DNA throughout conjugation and (2) drug resis-
tance genes that encode the proteins that mediate drug resistance.
The underside half of the determine depicts (from left to proper) the genes
that encode resistance to tetracycline, streptomycin, penicillin
(β-lactamase), chloramphenicol, erythromycin, and gentamicin.
might be proof against a couple of class of antibiotics (e.g.,
penicillins and aminoglycosides), and second, using an
antibiotic that selects for an organism resistant to at least one antibiotic
will choose for an organism that’s proof against all of the antibiotics
whose resistance genes are carried by the plasmid. For instance,
if an organism has the R plasmid depicted in Determine 11–1, then
using penicillin will choose for an organism resistant not
solely to penicillin, but in addition to tetracyclines, aminoglycosides
(e.g., streptomycin and gentamicin), chloramphenicol, and
erythromycin.
Along with producing drug resistance, R elements have two
essential properties: (1) they will replicate independently
of the bacterial chromosome; subsequently, a cell can include many
copies; and (2) they are often transferred not solely to cells of the
similar species, but in addition to different species and genera. Observe that
this conjugal switch is below the management of the genes of the R
plasmid and never of the F (fertility) plasmid, which governs the
switch of the bacterial chromosome (see Chapter 4).
R elements exist in two broad dimension classes: giant plasmids,
with molecular weights of about 60 million, and small ones,
with molecular weights of about 10 million. The massive plasmids
are conjugative R elements, which include the additional DNA to code
for the conjugation course of. The small R elements should not conjuga-
tive and include solely the resistance genes.
Along with conveying antibiotic resistance, R elements
impart two different traits: (1) resistance to metallic ions (e.g., they
code for an enzyme that reduces mercuric ions to elemental
mercury) and (2) resistance to sure bacterial viruses by cod-
ing for restriction endonucleases that degrade the DNA of the
infecting bacteriophages.
Transposon-Mediated Resistance
Transposons are genes which might be transferred both inside or
between bigger items of DNA such because the bacterial chromosome
and plasmids. A typical drug resistance transposon consists
of three genes flanked on each side by shorter DNA sequences,
normally a sequence of inverted repeated bases that mediate the
interplay of the transposon with the bigger DNA (see Determine
2–7). The three genes code for (1) transposase, the enzyme that
catalyzes excision and reintegration of the transposon; (2) a
repressor that regulates synthesis of the transposase; and (3) the
drug resistance gene.
SPECIFIC MECHANISMS OF
RESISTANCE
Penicillins & Cephalosporins—There are a number of mechanisms
of resistance to those medication. Cleavage by β-lactamases (penicil-
linases and cephalosporinases) is by far a very powerful (see
Determine 10–3). β-Lactamases produced by varied organisms
have completely different properties. For instance, staphylococcal penicil-
linase is inducible by penicillin and is secreted exterior of the
bacterium. In distinction, some β-lactamases produced by a number of
gram-negative rods are constitutively produced, are positioned
within the periplasmic area close to the peptidoglycan, and should not
secreted exterior of the bacterium.
The β-lactamases produced by varied gram-negative rods
have completely different specificities: some are extra lively in opposition to cepha-
losporins, others in opposition to penicillins. Clavulanic acid, tazobac-
tam, sulbactam, and avibactam are penicillin analogues that
bind strongly to β-lactamases and inactivate them. Combina-
tions of those inhibitors and penicillins (e.g., clavulanic acid
plus amoxicillin [Augmentin] and piperacillin plus tazobactam
[Zosyn]) can overcome resistance mediated by many however not all
β-lactamases.
Prolonged-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) inactivate
extended-spectrum cephalosporins (second- and third-
era cephalosporins), similar to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime,
and ceftazidime, in addition to penicillins and first-generation
cephalosporins. They’re produced by a number of enteric micro organism,
notably E. coli, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Proteus. ESBLs endow
the micro organism with resistance to all penicillins, cephalosporins,
and monobactams, similar to aztreonam. Carbapenems, similar to
imipenem, are the drug of option to deal with infections prompted
by ESBL-producing micro organism. Nonetheless, some ESBL-producing
micro organism have acquired resistance to carbapenems (through car-
bapenemases, see beneath) and might be handled solely with colistin, a
polypeptide antibiotic that doesn’t have a β-lactam ring.
In 2009, a brand new pressure of extremely resistant Klebsiella was
remoted in India carrying a plasmid that encoded New Delhi
metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-1). This plasmid confers high-
degree resistance to many antibiotics together with carbapenems and
has unfold from Klebsiella to different members of the Enterobac-
teriaceae. Resistant Enterobacteriaceae carrying NDM-1 have
emerged in lots of international locations, together with the USA.
Resistance to penicillins can be brought on by adjustments within the
penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) within the bacterial cell mem-
brane. These adjustments account for each the low-level and high-
degree resistance exhibited by S. pneumoniae to penicillin G and for
the resistance of S. aureus to nafcillin and different β-lactamase–
resistant penicillins. The resistance of MRSA to nearly all β-lactams
is attributed to the presence of PBP2a, which is discovered notably
in MRSA. The relative resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to
penicillins could also be as a result of altered penicillin-binding proteins.
Resistance to penicillin can be brought on by poor permeability
of the drug. For instance, low-level resistance of N. gonorrhoeae
to penicillin is attributed to poor permeability of the drug.
Excessive-level resistance is as a result of presence of a plasmid coding
for penicillinase.
Some isolates of S. aureus show yet one more type of
resistance, known as tolerance, through which progress of the organism
is inhibited by penicillin however the organism shouldn’t be killed. This
is attributed to a failure of activation of the autolytic enzymes,
murein hydrolases, which degrade the peptidoglycan.
Carbapenems—Resistance to carbapenems, similar to imipe-
nem, is brought on by carbapenemases that degrade the β-lactam
ring. This enzyme endows the organism with resistance to
penicillins and cephalosporins as properly. Carbapenemases are
produced by many enteric gram-negative rods, particularly
Klebsiella, Escherichia, and Pseudomonas. Carbapenem-resistant
strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae are an necessary reason behind
hospital-acquired infections and are proof against nearly all
identified antibiotics.
Vancomycin—Resistance to vancomycin is brought on by a
change within the peptide part of peptidoglycan from d-alanyl-
d-alanine, which is the conventional binding website for vancomycin,
to d-alanine-d-lactate, to which the drug doesn’t bind. Of
the 4 gene loci mediating vancomycin resistance, VanA is
a very powerful. It’s carried by a transposon on a plasmid
and offers high-level resistance to each vancomycin and
teicoplanin. (Teicoplanin is utilized in Europe however shouldn’t be accredited
in the USA.) The VanA locus encodes these enzymes
that synthesize d-alanine-d-lactate in addition to a number of regulatory
proteins.
Vancomycin-resistant strains of enterococci (VRE) have been
recovered from medical specimens. Uncommon isolates of S. aureus that
exhibit resistance to vancomycin have additionally been recovered from
affected person specimens. Uncommon isolates of S. pneumoniae that exhibit
tolerance to vancomycin have been recovered as properly.
Aminoglycosides—Resistance to aminoglycosides happens
by three mechanisms: (1) modification of the medication by
plasmid-encoded phosphorylating, adenylylating, and acetylat-
ing enzymes (a very powerful mechanism); (2) chromo-
somal mutation (e.g., a mutation within the gene that codes for the
goal protein within the 30S subunit of the bacterial ribosome); and
(3) decreased permeability of the bacterium to the drug.
Tetracyclines—Resistance to tetracyclines is the results of failure
of the drug to succeed in an inhibitory focus contained in the micro organism.
This is because of plasmid-encoded processes that both scale back the
uptake of the drug or improve its transport out of the cell.
Chloramphenicol—Resistance to chloramphenicol is due
to a plasmid-encoded acetyltransferase that acetylates the drug,
thus inactivating it.
Erythromycin—Resistance to erythromycin is due pri-
marily to a plasmid-encoded enzyme that methylates the 23S
rRNA, thereby blocking binding of the drug. An efflux pump
that reduces the focus of erythromycin throughout the
bacterium causes low-level resistance to the drug. An esterase
produced primarily by enteric gram-negative rods cleaves the
macrolide ring, which inactivates the drug.
Sulfonamides—Resistance to sulfonamides is mediated pri-
marily by two mechanisms: (1) a plasmid-encoded transport
system that actively exports the drug out of the cell, and (2) a chro-
mosomal mutation within the gene coding for the goal enzyme
dihydropteroate synthetase, which reduces the binding affinity
of the drug.
Trimethoprim—Resistance to trimethoprim is due primar-
ily to mutations within the chromosomal gene that encodes dihy-
drofolate reductase, the enzyme that reduces dihydrofolate to
tetrahydrofolate.
Quinolones—Resistance to quinolones is due primarily to
chromosomal mutations that modify the bacterial DNA gyrase.
Rifampin—Resistance to rifampin is because of a chromosomal
mutation within the gene encoding the bacterial RNA polymerase,
leading to ineffective binding of the drug. As a result of resistance
happens at excessive frequency (10–5), rifampin shouldn’t be prescribed alone
for the therapy of infections. It’s used alone for the prevention
of sure infections as a result of it’s administered for under a brief
time (see Desk 10–8).
Isoniazid—Resistance of M. tuberculosis to isoniazid is due
to mutations within the organism’s catalase–peroxidase gene. Cata-
lase or peroxidase enzyme exercise is required to synthesize the
metabolite of isoniazid that truly inhibits the expansion of
M. tuberculosis.
Ethambutol—Resistance of M. tuberculosis to ethambutol
is because of mutations within the gene that encodes arabinosyl trans-
ferase, the enzyme that synthesizes the arabinogalactan within the
organism’s cell wall.
Pyrazinamide—Resistance of M. tuberculosis to pyrazin-
amide (PZA) is because of mutations within the gene that encodes bacte-
rial amidase, the enzyme that converts PZA to the lively type of
the drug, pyrazinoic acid.
NONGENETIC BASIS OF RESISTANCE
There are a number of nongenetic causes for the failure of medication to
inhibit the expansion of micro organism:
(1) Micro organism might be walled off inside an abscess cavity that
the drug can not penetrate successfully. Surgical drainage is there-
fore a vital adjunct to chemotherapy.
(2) Micro organism might be in a resting state (i.e., not rising); they
are subsequently insensitive to cell wall inhibitors similar to penicillins
and cephalosporins. Equally, M. tuberculosis can stay dor-
mant in tissues for a few years, throughout which period it’s insensi-
tive to medication. If host defenses are lowered and the micro organism start
to multiply, they’re once more vulnerable to the medication, indicating
{that a} genetic change didn’t happen.
(3) Underneath sure circumstances, organisms that may ordi-
narily be killed by penicillin can lose their cell partitions, survive as
protoplasts, and be insensitive to cell wall–lively medication. Later,
if such organisms resynthesize their cell partitions, they’re totally
vulnerable to those medication.
(4) The presence of international our bodies makes profitable antibi-
otic therapy tougher. This is applicable to international our bodies such
as surgical implants and catheters in addition to supplies that enter
the physique on the time of penetrating accidents, similar to splinters
and shrapnel.
(5) A number of artifacts could make it seem that the organisms
are resistant (e.g., administration of the incorrect drug or the
incorrect dose or failure of the drug to succeed in the suitable website
within the physique). (An excellent instance of the latter is the poor penetra-
tion into spinal fluid by a number of early-generation cephalospo-
rins.) Failure of the affected person to take the drug (noncompliance,
nonadherence) is one other artifact.
SELECTION OF RESISTANT BACTERIA
BY OVERUSE & MISUSE OF
ANTIBIOTICS
Critical outbreaks of ailments brought on by gram-negative rods resis-
tant to a number of antibiotics have occurred in lots of creating
international locations. In North America, many hospital-acquired infections
are brought on by multidrug-resistant organisms. Three details
of overuse and misuse of antibiotics enhance the probability of
these issues by enhancing the choice of resistant mutants:
(1) Some physicians use a number of antibiotics when one would
be ample, prescribe unnecessarily lengthy programs of antibiotic
remedy, use antibiotics in self-limited infections for which they
should not wanted, and overuse antibiotics for prophylaxis earlier than
and after surgical procedure.
(2) In lots of international locations, antibiotics are bought over-the-counter
to most of the people; this observe encourages inappropriate and
indiscriminate use of the medication.
(3) Antibiotics are utilized in animal feed to stop infections
and promote progress. This selects for resistant organisms within the
animals and will contribute to the pool of resistant organisms
in people.
ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY TESTING
Antibiogram
An antibiogram is the time period used to explain the outcomes of anti-
biotic susceptibility assessments carried out on the micro organism remoted
from the affected person. These outcomes are a very powerful issue
in figuring out the selection of antibiotic with which to deal with the
affected person. Different elements such because the affected person’s renal operate and
hypersensitivity profile should even be thought-about in selecting the
antibiotic.
There are two sorts of assessments used to find out the anti-
biogram: (1) the tube dilution check that determines the minimal
inhibitory focus and (2) the disk diffusion (Kirby-Bauer)
check that determines the diameter of the zone of inhibition (see
following dialogue and Figures 11–2 and 11–3).
Minimal Inhibitory Focus
For a lot of infections, the outcomes of sensitivity testing are impor-
tant within the selection of antibiotic. These outcomes are generally
reported because the minimal inhibitory focus (MIC),
which is outlined because the lowest focus of drug that
inhibits the expansion of the organism. The MIC is decided by
inoculating the organism remoted from the affected person right into a sequence
of tubes or cups containing twofold dilutions of the drug (Determine
11–2). After incubation at 35°C for 18 hours, the bottom concen-
tration of drug that forestalls seen progress of the organism is
the MIC. This offers the doctor with a exact concentra-
tion of drug to information the selection of each the drug and the dose.
A second technique of figuring out antibiotic sensitivity is the
disk diffusion technique, through which disks impregnated with varied
antibiotics are positioned on the floor of an agar plate that has
been inoculated with the organism remoted from the affected person
(Determine 11–3). After incubation at 35°C for 18 hours, throughout
which period the antibiotic diffuses outward from the disk, the
diameter of the zone of inhibition is decided. The dimensions of
the zone of inhibition is in contrast with requirements to find out
the sensitivity of the organism to the drug.
Minimal Bactericidal Focus
For sure infections, similar to endocarditis, you will need to
know the focus of drug that truly kills the organism
quite than the focus that merely inhibits progress. This
focus, known as the minimal bactericidal focus
(MBC), is decided by taking a small pattern (0.01 or 0.1
mL) from the tubes used for the MIC assay and spreading it
over the floor of a drug-free blood agar plate (Determine 11–2).
Any organisms that had been inhibited however not killed now have a
likelihood to develop as a result of the drug has been diluted considerably.
After incubation at 35°C for 48 hours, the bottom focus
that has decreased the variety of colonies by 99.9%, in contrast
with the drug-free management, is the MBC. Bactericidal medication usu-
ally have an MBC equal or similar to the MIC, whereas
bacteriostatic medication normally have an MBC considerably greater
than the MIC.
Serum Bactericidal Exercise
Within the therapy of endocarditis, it may be helpful to find out
whether or not the drug is efficient by assaying the flexibility of the drug
within the affected person’s serum to kill the organism. This check, known as the
serum bactericidal exercise, is carried out in a fashion just like
that of the MBC dedication, besides that it’s a serum pattern
from the affected person, quite than a normal drug resolution, that’s
used. After a normal inoculum of the organism has been added
and the combination has been incubated at 35°C for 18 hours, a small
pattern is subcultured onto blood agar plates, and the serum
dilution that kills 99.9% of the organisms is decided. Scientific
expertise has proven {that a} peak1
serum bactericidal exercise of
1:8 or 1:16 is satisfactory for profitable remedy of endocarditis.
β-Lactamase Manufacturing
For extreme infections brought on by sure organisms, similar to S. aureus
and Haemophilus influenzae, you will need to know as quickly as
potential whether or not the organism remoted from the affected person is produc-
ing β-lactamase. For this function, fast assays for the enzyme can
be used that yield a solution in a couple of minutes, versus an
MIC check or a disk diffusion check, each of which take 18 hours.
A generally used process is the chromogenic β-lactam
technique, through which a coloured β-lactam drug is added to a suspension
of the organisms. If β-lactamase is made, hydrolysis of the β-lactam
ring causes the drug to show a unique shade in 2 to 10 minutes.
Disks impregnated with a chromogenic β-lactam may also be used.
USE OF ANTIBIOTIC COMBINATIONS
Most often, the one greatest antimicrobial agent needs to be
chosen to be used as a result of this minimizes unwanted effects. Nonetheless,
there are a number of cases through which two or extra medication are com-
monly given:
(1) To deal with severe infections earlier than the id of the
organism is thought.
(2) To realize a synergistic inhibitory impact in opposition to sure
organisms.
(3) To stop the emergence of resistant organisms. (If bac-
teria turn out to be resistant to at least one drug, the second drug will kill
them, thereby stopping the emergence of resistant strains.)
Two medication can work together in one in every of a number of methods (Determine 11–4).
They’re normally detached to one another (i.e., additive solely).
Typically there’s a synergistic interplay, through which the impact
of the 2 medication collectively is considerably higher than the sum of
the results of the 2 medication appearing individually. Hardly ever, the impact
of the 2 medication collectively is antagonistic, through which the result’s
considerably decrease exercise than the sum of the actions of the
two medication alone.
A synergistic impact may result from a wide range of mecha-
nisms. For instance, the mix of a penicillin and an
aminoglycoside similar to gentamicin has a synergistic motion
in opposition to enterococci (E. faecalis), as a result of penicillin damages the
cell wall sufficiently to reinforce the entry of aminoglycoside.
When given alone, neither drug is efficient. A second instance
is the mix of a sulfonamide with trimethoprim. On this
occasion, the 2 medication act on the identical metabolic pathway, such
that if one drug doesn’t inhibit folic acid synthesis sufficiently,
the second drug offers efficient inhibition by blocking a sub-
sequent step within the pathway.
Though antagonism between two antibiotics is uncommon,
one instance is clinically necessary. This entails using
penicillin G mixed with the bacteriostatic drug tetracycline
within the therapy of meningitis brought on by S. pneumoniae. Antag-
onism happens as a result of the tetracycline inhibits the expansion of the
organism, thereby stopping the bactericidal impact of penicillin
G, which kills solely rising organisms.